மள்ளரிய தந்தை
இரா.தேவ ஆசிர்வாதம்
முன்னாள் டிப்டி கலெக்டர்
Moovendar - Race
[Letter Correspondence by the author with Dr. K.K. Pillay (Historian) On Moovendar race]
From :
R. DEVA ASIRVATHAM,
Thanjavur
180, Yagappa Nagar
4-5-1976. .
TO :
Dr.KK.PILLAY,
Retired Professor & Head of the
History Department,
Madras University,
Chepauk, Chennai - 5
Dearsir,
I had occasion to go through your work “தமிழக வரலாறு; மக்களும் பண்பாடும்” at page 399 of which, it is mentioned that a quarrel arose between Devendra kudumbars and Parayars over the use of certain privileges and as a result of the same, the Parayars were conferred certain privileges like the use of white elephant, white parasol, sixteen pillars pandal, eighteen musical instruments etc. I feel the matter has been misreported. According to Karivalam Vandanallur temple inscription, the above privileges belonged to Devendra Kudumbars from time immemorial and that Tirumalai Nayakkan just recognised the same after verifying old copper plates and as regards the Parayars, he conferred on them a few privileges like the use of three pillars Pandal, orie Kodukku, one marappu etc. Prof. K.R. Hanumamthan, Head of the History Department, Presidency College Chennai, has also mentioned like that in his work "Untouchability in Tamillagham', a thesis submitted to the Madras University for Ph.D. I hope thé facts will be verified again and error if any corrected when reprint of the work is taken up.
I am making a study about the Moovendar race and according to my findings, Devendra kula velalars whom the caste people contemptuously call as pallans and who figure as Mallars in the Sangam literature are the people who produced the Chera, Chola, Pandya Kings both during the Sangam and the latter period. This is just for your information.
With regards.
Your's Sincerely,
(Sd.) R.D. Asirvatham.
K.K. Pillay, M.A., D.Litt., D.Phil (Oxon),
Institute of Traditional Cultures,
Director. University Buildings, Chennai - 5.
15-5-76.
Sir,
I thank you for your letter of 4 – 5 - 76, I am sorry for the delay in replying to your letter. I was out ọf station for a time. I am much interested in the question raised by you; viz the conflict between the Devendra Kudumbar and Parayar. My informationis based on records in the Tamil Nadu State Archives Egmore. But if more reliable information is available. I shall be happy to look into it. Kindly let me know the Epigraphic report in which the concerned Karivalam Vandanallur temple inscription is published. I am interésted in writing the social history of the Tamils in an objective manner. Therefore any new and authentic piece of information is welcome.
I would also like to know the connection between the Dévendra Kula Velalar and the Chera, Cholas Pandyas of the Sangam period.
Thanking you,
Please reply me,
Your's Sincèrely,
(sd) KK. PILLAY
From :
R. DEVA ASIRVATHAM,
Thanjavur
180, Yagappa Nagar
24-5-1976. .
TO :
Dr.KK.PILLAY,
Institute of Traditional Cultures
University Buildings, Chennai - 5.
Dear sir,
Recived your letter dated 15 - 5 - 1976. For Karivalam Vandanallur Culvert, you may please refer to inscription No. 432 / 1914, published in the South indian inscriptions Part II (Tinnevelly District, Sankaranarayanar Koil Taluk) .Devendra Kudumbars or Devendra Kula Velalars are none - else than Mallars, the people of Marudanilam, who founded the three Tamil Kingdoms - Chera, Chola, Pandyas and after the Kalabhra interregnum, they again came to power. After subjugation by the Vijayanaga rulers, they were persecuted and degraded as Pallars by the composition of a large number of pallu songs. The poligar system was introduced only with a view to depriving these people of their land holdings. Because of their liberality, these people were called as velalars and in latter medieval period as Vellalars. When Various sections drawn from Kurinji, Mullai and Neidal regions, who gained in soial status began to style themselves as Vellalars, the original Vellalars assumed the title of Devendra Kulathar - Devendran, Indran, Purandaram all meaning Vendan, the god of Marudanilam. All the Tamil Scholars have deliberately distorted the literature and grammar etc., with the result, historians have not hither to been able to find out the tribe which ruled over Tamil Nadu during the Sangam and the latter period. Historians are confusing themselves with the words Maran Tirayan and Vanavan.
All the Tamil kings were from Mallars only. The study about Mallars has been neglected by scholars. This tribe should have been responsible for the Harappa Civilisation. They have offered resistance to Alexander. They had a republican form of Government during Buddha's period and Buddha is said to have breathed his last in the kingdom of the Mallars. In Nepal also, the Mallars were in power till in 17th century A.D. or so. Whether the Harappa and Adichanallur Civilisation were simultaneous or one preceded the other, is a matter for study by research scholars.
After overthrow by the Nayaks, Devendrakula Velalars were suppressed and oppressed and they being deprived of thier holdings, in effect became agricultural serfs. In these days Parayars were set up to spite them and so the conflict between the two sections.
Your's Sincerely,
(Sd.) R.D. Asirvatham.
Institute of Traditional cultures
K.K. Pillay, M.A., D.Litt., D.Phil (Oxon) Room'No.94, University M.A., D.Litt.,
No.190 / 2 / PP / 76-1 Buildings,
Director. Chennai-600 005.
Dated 127-1976
Dear Thiru Deva Asirvatham :
I thank you for your interesting letter. I do hope that you would make a detailed research on Devendra Kula Vellalars and Mallars and publish a correct documented treatise embodying your conclusions.
With regards.
Your's Sincèrely,
(sd) KK. PILLAY
Review of Moovendar Yaar? by the Indian Express (March II, 1978)
The three Tamil monarchs, Chera, Chola and Pandya of yore had a very hoary origin dating back to the pre - Sangam age say two to three thousand years B.C. The author of this book tries, to trace their origin to the three very ancient Tamil people called Mallar or Pallar who were agriculturists by profession and the first builders of cities, towns and kingdoms on river banks. These aborigins were later reduced to the state of serfs under the Telgu and Muslim rulers. They were also known by the name of Devandra Kudumbars or Devendra Kula Velalars who were the founders of the Chera, Chola and Pandya Kingdoms and who came to power again after the Kalabra interregnum. The Poligar system introduced by the Vijayanagar rulers deprived these people of their land holdings and they were, reduced to abject poverty. Being originally inhabitants of the Marudam tract or fertile agricultural land they worshipped Indra (also known as Vendan. Devendran, Purandaran etc.) the Lord of the region and called themselves Devendra Kulathaar. The author charges literature with deliberately attempting to distort historical facts to suppress the truth about the original tribes which ruled Tamil Nadu during the Sangam age and the later period and asserts that all the Tamil Kings were Mallars only who were also responsible for the Harappan civilisation. They met with their fall from the 16 th century A.D. These people were not only agriculturists but also warriors. The author believes that Pandavas of Hastinapur belonged to this ancient tribe.
The compendious name of Thevar, meaning Indra's descendents for the three Tamil group Kallar, Maravar and Ahamudayaar, is derived from the fact that these groups were the progenies of Indra through Ahalya, wife of Gautama. These are interesting points made out by the author. His thesis gives much food for thought and grist for controversy too.
R. Kristinamoorthy.
Review of Vellalar Yaar? by the Indian Express (December, 19. 1981)
There are different theories about the origin of Tamils especially those who occupied the Pandya country. One school of scholars say that they descended into upper India from China via the Himalayan passes and occupied a territory with their capital in a place known as Tamra - lipti or Tamluk in Bengal from which they derived the name of Tamils. They moved further down south. As they were the first to colonise the country. they came to be known as "Pandayar" or old colonialists. Still others claim that they were the original inhabitants of the country. Similar controversies exist about the origin of Vellalars, an ancient Tamil community. Some say that they are Dravidians, while others claim that they came from the Gangetic plains. The book, under review, written by an author whose earlier work on the three Tamil kings, caused. many eyebrows to be raised, presents an extensive study about the origin customs and habits of Vellalas.
First he presents the view of authors like Nelson, Caldwell and others about the origin of Vellalars. Nelson claims that they were foreign immigrants who were introduced by Pandyas into the Tamil country. Caldwell says that the original inhabitants of the Tamil Country cultivated only, dry grains and ate these grains and animals hunted by them. The Vellalars, who derived the name by their being good in controlling floods and using it for irrigation, introduced cultivation of rice in these lands.
Next he discusses the Puranic episode about the Viswakarma community and the theory that Vellalas came from the Gangetic plain. The claim that Vellalas and Ballalas of Karnataka and Velammas of Andhra Pradesh are the same is refuted by the author. He concludes that the original Vellalas of the Tamil lands were the Mallas or Pallas who cultivated lands.
The author also presents details about various sub - sections among Vellalas of the present day and concludes that they are a mixed race. He says that all people employed by Pandya Kings to help them in day – to - day administration proclaimed themselves as Vellalas. He also refutes the theory of Maraimalai Adigal that the term Vellalas refers to a particular group of people who were strict vegatarians.
The author, a former Deputy Collector has extensively quoted the views of foreign and Indian writers and also from ancient classics to support his views. The book which presents an extensive study on the subject is worth reading by all. - TAS.
(தொடரும்)
VILLAVAR AND BANAS
ReplyDeletePandya is the title of Villavar rulers as well as Banas. Bana kingdoms were present throughout India. Most of the India were ruled by Bana rulers. Throughout India numerous places called Banpur which were capitals of Banas exist. Banas were called as Banasura also.
Banas were the the Northern cousins of Villavar who ruled Kerala and Tamilnadu. In Karnataka and Andhra also was ruled by Banas.
VILLAVAR SUBGROUPS
1. Villavar
2. Malayar
3. Vanavar
The seagoing cousins of Villavar were called Meenavar
4. Meenavar
Pandyas emerged from all these subgroups in the ancient times. They also used the flag of the sub clans. For eg.
1. Pandyan from Villavar clan was called Sarangadwaja Pandyan. He carried a Bow-arrow flag.
2. Pandyan from Malayar clan was called Malayadwaja Pandyan. He carried a flag with Hill insignia.
3. Pandyan from Vanavar subclan carried a Bow-arrow or Tiger or Tree flag.
4. Pandyan from Meenavar clan carried a fish flag and called himself Meenavan.
In the laterdays all the Villavar clans merged to form Nadalvar clans. Ancient Meenavar clan also merged with Villavar and Nadalvar clans.
Laterdays Nagas who migrated from North became fishermen in south. They are not ethnically related to Villavar-Meenavar clans.
VILLAVAR TITLES
Villavar, Nadalvar, Nadar, Santar, Chanar, Shanar, Charnnavar, Chantrahar, Chanthahan, Chandar, Perumbanar, Panickar, Thiruppappu, Kavara (Kavurayar), Illam, Kiriyam, Kana, Mara Nadar, Nattathi, Pandiyakula Kshatriya, Nelamakkarar etc.
Ancient Pandyan dynasty was split into three kingdoms.
1. Chera dynasty.
2. Chola dynasty
3. Pandyan dynasty
CHERA CHOLA PANDYAN DYNASTIES
Chera kings were Villavars, Pandiyas were Villavar-Meenavar and Cholas were Vanavars and all of them belonged to Villavar-Meenavar clans
All were supported by Villavars.
ORDER OF IMPORTANCE
1. Chera Kingdom
Villavar
Malaiyar
Vanavar
Iyakkar
2. Pandian Empire
Villavar
Meenavar
Vanavar
Malaiyar
3. Chola Empire
Vanavar
Villavar
Malaiyar
BANA AND MEENA
In the Northern India Villavar were known as Banas and Bhils. Meenavar were known as Meena or Matsya.
Early residents of Indus Valley and Gangetic plains were Bana and Meena clans.
King Virata who gave refuge to Pandavas for one year was a Matsya - Meena ruler.
Despite their Asura status Banas were invited to all Swayamvaras.
ASSAM BANA KINGDOM
A Bana kingdom called Asura Kingdom with capital at Sonitpur ruled Assam during ancient times. Throughout India Bana-Meena and Villavar-Meenavar kingdoms existed until the end of middle ages.
MAHABALI
Banas and Villavar considered King Mahabali as their ancestor. Numerous kings with Mahabali title ruled India. Villavars called their ancestor Mahabali as Maveli.
ONAM
Onam festival celebrates the return of king Mahabali who had ruled Kerala every year. The places Mavelikkara, Mahabalipuram both named after Mahabali.
MAVELI
One of the titles of Pandyas were Maveli. Pandyas rivals the Banas were also called Maveli Vanathi Rayar.
DANAVA DAITYA
Ancient Danavas and Daityas could be Bana subgroup of Indus Valley. The king of Daityas was called Mahabali. The first Dams in India were built by Banas on the Indus river four thousand years ago.
HIRANYAGARBHA CEREMONY
Both Villavars and Banas performed Hiranyagarbha ceremony. In Hiranyagarbha ceremony the Pandya king simulated to emerge from the golden womb of King Hiranya. Hiranya was the ancestor of Mahabali.
VILLAVAR AND BANAS
DeleteWAR AGAINST NAGAS
Kalithokai an ancient Tamil literature describes a great war fought between combined armies of Villavar Meenavar against Nagas. In that war Villavar Meenavar were defeated and Nagas occupied central India.
NAGA MIGRATION TO SOUTH
Various clans of Nagas migrated to south India and Srilanka especially to coastal areas.
1. Varunakulathor(Karave)
2. Guhankulathor (Maravar, Murguhar, Sinhalese)
3. Kurukalathor (Karaiyar)
4. Paradavar
5. Kalabhras (Kallar, Kalappalar, Vellalar)
6. Ahichatram Nagas (Nair)
These Nagas were the main enemies of Villavars. Nagas sided with Delhi Sultanate, Vijayanagara Naickars and Europeans colonial rulers and opposed Villavars, leading to Villavar downfall.
KARNATAKA'S BANA AND VILLAVAR ENMITY
Despite having common origins Karnataka's Banas and Villavar were enemies. Kerala was occupied by Banas from Alupas Pandyan Kingdom of Tulunadu (Banapperumal) in 1120 AD.
Balija Naickers occupied Tamilnadu in 1377 AD.
Chola Pandyan kingdoms of Villavar were occupied by Balija Naickars (Bana descendents of Mahabali, Banajigas) of Vijayanagara empire.
END OF VILLAVARS
The invasion of Malik Kafur in 1310 led to the defeat of Pandyan dynasty. Villavars were massacred and all the three Tamil kingdoms came to an end.
KARNATAKAS PANDYAN KINGDOMS
Karnataka had many Banappandyan kingdoms
1. Alupa Pandyan kingdom
2. Uchangi Pandyan Kingdom
3. Santara Pandyan kingdom
4. Nurumpada Pandyan kingdom.
Karnataka Pandyans used Kulasekhara title also.
ANDHRAPRADESH
Bana kingdoms of Andhra
1. Bana kingdom
2. Vijayanagara kingdom.
FLAGS OF BANAS
Early
1. Double Fish
2. Bow-Arrow
Late
1. Bull Crest
2. Monkey crest (Vanara dwaja)
3. Conch
4. Wheel
5. Eagle
Travancore Kings had Conch Insignia on their flag because they were Banas from Alupa dynasty Karnataka.
Sethupathis had Anumakkodi or Hanuman flag (Vanara Dwaja) because they were Vanathirayars from Kalinga.
THE TITLES OF VILLAVAR-BANA DYNASTIES
ReplyDeleteBANA KINGDOM OF ANDHRA
Bana, Mahabali Vanathi Rayar, Mahavili Vanathirayar, Vanniar Vanathiraja, Vanava Rayar, Vana Adiyar, Sanna, Balija, Naicker, Manavalan, Kanda Gopalan, Choda
KOLAR BANA KINGDOM
Bana,Vanathirayar, Vanar, Mahabali Vanathirayar, Vanniar Mudiyeda Manavalan, Thirumaliruncholai Vana, Ponparappinan.
GOUD
Setti Balija
KALINGA BANA KINGDOM- RAMNAD- ARYACHAKRAVARTHI KINGDOM
Gangai Pillai Vanathirayar, Pillai Kulasekhara Vanathirayar, Vanniyar, Kalinga Villavan, Dananjaya, Makone, Kulasekhara, Singai Ariyan
MAHARASHTRA
Bhantari
NORTH INDIAN BANA-MEENA KINGDOMS
VILLAVAR -MEENAVAR TITLE AND BHIL-MEENA TITLES
1. VIllavar = Bhil
2. Malayar= Mer, Mehr, Mehar, Meron, Mewar, Mevasi, Gomaladu
3. Vanavar= Bana, Vana
4. Meenavar= Meena
5. Nadar, Nadalwar= Nadhala, Natharwal
6. Santar, Chandar= Chanda
7. Chera = Seroh
MEENA DYNASTY OF RAJASTHAN
Chanda, Chanda Meena, Meena, Bhil-Meena, Nadala, Nadhala, Nattala, Natharwal, Nattharwal, Gomaladu, Sihra, Seroh
BHIL CLANS
Bhil, Bhil Meena, Bhil Garasia, Dholi Bhil, Dungri Bhil, Dungri Garasia, Mewasi Bhil, Rawal Bhil, Tadvi Bhil, Bhagalia, Bhilala, Pawra, Vasava and Vasave.
BANA MERCHANTS OF NORTH INDIA
BANIA
Baaniya, Bania, Vania, Vaishnav Vania, Gupta
RAJPUT CLANS
Agnivanshi Rajputs, Chauhan
PANDYAS OF KUNDESHWAR BANPUR TIKAMGARH MADHYA PRADESH
Pandya, Panda, Pandyas of Kundeshwar, Baghwar Kshatriya, Bhagwar Rajput,
TIRGAR
Agni, Vanni, Tirbanda, Tirbonda, Tirgala, Banawadi, Bani Sad, Banwati, Kamanagar, Kamangar, Kamnagar, Ransaz, Tidgad, , Tirkar, Tirmali, Tirwar, Titkar, Tridar
PALLAVA BANA OF PANCHALA COUNTRY AND TAMILNADU
Vanniar, Vanniya Kula Kshatriyar, Agnikula Kshatriar, Kaduvetty, Thigalar, Vada Balija, Chavalakkarar, Chavalar, Vanne Kapu, Palle Kapu, Naicker, Vannia Gaunder
BANA KINGDOM OF SONITPUR ASSAM
Asura, Bana, Mahabali
TITLES OF BANA CLANS OF INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION
Mahabali, Danava, Daitya, Asura
________________________________
NAGA KINGDOMS OF NORTH INDIA
ReplyDeleteIn the ancient times many Naga countries existed in the north India. The Dravidian inhabitants of Ancient Tamilakam had called themselves as Thamizhar. The Dravidian Tamilakam was ruled by Villavar-Nadazhwar clans.
People from Kuru country at Northern India called themselves as Kuru kulam or Bharatha kulam .
People from Indus Valley area called themselves Sindhu Nattar.
The agriculturists from Kalinga country were called kalinga Vellalar.
People from Ganges area called themselves Gangai Nattar or Gaudas or Gaunder or Kongu Vellalar.
People from Parada country in Baloochistan called themselves as Paradavar.
The chieftains of ancient Chedi kingdom called themselves as Chedirayars. Chedi kingdom was situated at the modern Bundelkhand area ie parts of Uttarpradesh and Madhyapradesh. Kalabhras have migrated from Chedi kingdom to Orissa and then to Karnataka and then invaded Tamilakam.
Bhargava kulam was founded by Brahmin sage Parashurama. The Nambuthiris who pretend to be Pandalam Pandiyans claim that Pandiyan dynasty belonged to the brahmin Bhargava kulam. In Tamilnadu Mooppanars who are part of Kallar community also claim that they have descended from Bhargava kulam.
Northern Naga clans called themselves Indra kulam and they claimed to descend from the clan of Naga Indra king Nahushan.
Most of the Northern Naga clans have migrated to Tamilnadu who are still known by the name of their ancient north Indian countries.
MIGRATION OF NAGA CLANS TO SOUTH INDIA
The Guhan clans belong to the clansmen of Guhan who were fishermen at the Sarayu river, which was a branch of Ganges river. From the three Guhan clans three major dynasties called Singar, Vangar and Kalingar emerged according to Mattakalappu Manmiyam. Mattakalappu Manmiyam also says that three Guhan clans otherwise known as Murguhar or Mukkulathor Emerged. The three clisely related Murguhar clans were Maravar, Mukkuvar and Sinhalese according to Mattakalappu Manmiyam. Srilanka, and its adjoining areas such as Ramnad and coastal Tamilnadu were occupied by some of the Naga Murguhar-Mukkalathor clans in the ancient times.
Sinhalese also belonged to the Naga ethnicity and they were ethnically related to Nagas of Tamilnadu.
From 560 BC onwards large scale Naga migration to Srilanka and then to Ramnad and coastal Tamilakam by Guhan kulathor ie Sinhalese, Maravar and Mukkuvar occurred. Next Karaiyar who identified themselves with Kuru kula of Pandaavas and and Kauravas migrated to south India and Srilanka.
After the invasion of Alexander in 323 BC Paradavar from Parada country in Baloochistan appeared in the Tamil country. Chozha king Ilamchetchenni defeated the Paradavar who had settled at the coastal Tamilakam. Then Sangam literature described various Naga clans such as Maravar, Eyinar, Aruvalar, Oliar, Oviar and Paradavar.
Around 172 BC Velalar who had migrated from Chedi Kingdom to Kalinga country, and who were henchmen of Kalingan king Karavela, occupied northern Tamil nadu and named it as Kharnadu after their king Kharavela. The Velalar who were servants of Kalingan king Kharavela called themselves as Velalar, Khar Katha Velalar and Kalinga Velalar. The leaders of the Naga Velalar were Yadhavas called Velir.
In 250 AD a Naga clan called Kalabhras invaded Chera, Chola and Pandiyan kingdoms. Kalabhra interregnum In which Tamilakam was devastated between 250 AD to 570 AD period was considered as a dark age. Vellalar-Kalappalar and Kallar might be the descendents of Kalabhra invaders.
Another group of Nepalese Nagas called Nairs, were brought from Ahichatra in the Uttara Panchala country, as slave warriors by the Brahmin Kadamba king Mayuravarma to Karnataka in 345 AD. Ahichatra meant snake kingdom.
FALSE CLAIM THAT THE CHERA, CHOLA AND PANDYA KINGS WERE OF ARYAN AND NAGA DESCENT
ReplyDeleteMany Aryan and Naga clans pretend to be Chera, Chola Pandyas.
In Kerala, Namboodiris, who have never spoken Tamil, pretending be descendents of Pandalam Pandyas.The Namboodiris claim that the Pandyas belonged to their own Barghavakulam. Barghavakulam was founded by Brahmin Rishi Parasurama.
Various Naga clans who descend from the Aryan-Naga Indra clan in Tamil Nadu pretend to be Dravidian Chera Chola Pandya kings. They also claim that Indra was the ancestor of Dravidian Villavar kings such as Chera Chola and Pandiyan.
But Indra and Nagas were the enemies of the Dravidian Villavar-Meenavar people. Nagas were a completely different North Indian race.
The Nagas of Tamil Nadu such as Kallars claim that the Cholas belonged to their own Bhargava clan, similar to the claims of Namboodiri Pandyas of Kerala. . The Chera Chola Pandya dynasty had no affiliation with the Aryan Brahmin Namboodiri or with the Nagas such as Kallar, Maravar, Agamudaiyar and Vellalar.
The Chera Chola Pandya dynasties came from the Dravidian Villavar-Nadazhvar clans. They were supported by the Villavar, Meenavar and Iyakkar clans. The Villavar aristocracy was called as Nadalvar or Nadar clans.
The Vanavar clan were Cholas, the Villavar-Meenavar clan were Pandyas and the Villavar clan were Cheras. They all belong to the Villavar dynasties.
THE CLAIMS OF THE ARYANS AND NAGA-KALABHRAS
1. Pandalam Namboodiris who pretend to be Pandyas claim that the Pandyas belong to their Brahmin Bhargava clan.
2. In Tamil Nadu the Mooppanar subdivision Bhargava clan of Udayars claim that they are related to the Cholas. This Bhargava clan of the Nagas seems to be different from the Bhargava clan of the Namboodiris. The Naga Barghavakulam is a clan of nomads who migrated from the Chedi kingdom.
3. The claim that the Yadavas and Nagas of the Chandra dynasty were related to the Pandya dynasty. The Dravidian Chandra Vamsam established by the ancient Pandya dynasty is different from the Yadava-Naga Chandra dynasty founded by Nahushan.
4. Various Naga clans such as Kallar, Maravar, Agamudaiyar and Vellalar claim that the Chola Pandya dynasties came from their own Indra clan. The Chera, Chola and Pandya dynasties were founded by the Dravidian Villavar-Nadalwar clans. The Chera, Chola and Pandya kings were not Nagas and they did not belong to the Indra clan of the Aryan-Naga people.
5. The claim that the founders of the Chola dynasty were Velir. The Velir were early Kalabhra invaders. The Velirs invaded the Chola kingdom at 172 BC on the orders of King Karavela of Kalinga. The Velirs had Yadava-Naga roots, who migrated from the Chedi kingdom to Kalinga, from where they invaded the Chola country. The Cholas belong to the Vanavar subgroup of the Villavars.
6. Claim that Chedi Rayars were associated with the Malayamans and that they were a branch of the Cholas.
Kalabhras were the migrants from the Chedi kingdom and their leaders were called Chedi Rayars. The Chedirayars may have Yadava-Naga roots. The Malayamans were the leaders of the Malayar subgroup of the Dravidian Villavars. Under the Cholas, in the Middle Ages some Malayaman clans might have mixed with the Chedi Rayar clans of the Kalabhras. The titles Chedirayar and Servarayar in the among the Kallachantars indicate that some Villava Nadars also mingled with the Kalabhras.
The Kalla Chantar and Malayan Chantar clans may be ethnically related to the Kalabhra descendants such as Kallar and Vellalar.
7. Bharata Kulam is another name of the Kuru dynasty, i.e. the Kurukula from which the Pandavas and Kauravas originated. The Parataraja or Parvata Rajakulam ruled Balochistan in Pakistan. The Paratarajas were in no way connected to Dravidian Villavars or Pandiyan dynasty.
Conclusion:
The Chera, Chola and Pandyan dynasties were founded by the Nadazhwars or Nadars who originated from the Villavar clans such as Villavar, Malayar, Vanavar and Meenavar.
________________________________________
SANTARA PANDIAN DYNASTY
ReplyDeleteSantara Pandians who ruled Karnataka were the northern cousins of Nadars alias Santars of Villavar lineage. Santara Pandiyan clan was a branch of Kadamba Banappandiyan dynasty which ruled from Banavasi.
KADAMBA DYNASTY
Kadamba dynasty kings belonged Bana dynasty also known as Banappandiyan dynasty. Kadamba dynasty ruled from northern Karnataka with Banavasi as their capital. Banas were Northern cousins of Villavar who ruled Chera, Chola Pandyan dynasties. Thus Santara Pandiyan dynasty were northern relatives of Villavar Nadalvar-Nadar clans.
Kadambas were jungle dwellers similar to Vanavar subgroup of Villavars. Vanavar used tree insignia on their flags and in latter days Tiger insignia. Both Tree and Tiger were related to Jungle. Similarly Kadambas used Kadamba tree on their flags. Kadamba capital was known as Vanavasi or Banavasi. Kadambas and other Bana dynasties though related to Villavars were the arch enemies of Villavars.
KADAMBA ATTACK OF CHERA DYNASTY
Ancient Chera dynasty was repeatedly attacked by Kadambas of Banavasi. Imayavaramban Neduncheralathan (130 AD to 188 AD) claims to have defeated the Kadambas of Banavasi and also to have cut down the Kadamba tree which was the Royal identity of the Kadambas.
CLANS OF KADAMBA
The Banappandiyan dynasty of Kadambas had two Royal clans
1. Nurumbada Pandiya
2. Santara Pandiya
Nurumbada Pandiyan clans ruled from Nurumbada territory. Nurumbada meant one hundred paddyfields is Villages.
Santara Pandiyan clans ruled from Santalige territory. Santalige meant House of Santar clans.
Banas were the northern cousins of Villavars. Banas had similar Royal titles as the Villavar clans. Bana is the Sanskritised form of Villavar.
Villavar = Bana Bhilla, Bhillava
Nadar = Nador, Uppu Nador,Torke Nador
Nadalvar = Nadavara, Nadava
Santar = Santara, Santha, Canta, Chanta, Santhara and Santa
Vanavar = Bana, Bantari, Bant
Malayar = Maleya
Meeenavar=Machiarasa
Chanar = Channa
Sanar = Sanna, Masana Masannaya
Pandiya=Pandiya
Udaiyar=Vodeya, Odeya
SANTARA DYNASTY
First references about Santharas were in the inscriptions installed by the Chalukyan king Vinayaditya in 682 AD. Santara dynasty was also called as Cantas, Chanta, Santhara, Santa and Santha.
JINADATTA RAYA
Jinadatta Raya or Jindutt Rai, who was a Jain prince from Mathura in Northern India was the supposed founder of the Santara dynasty in 800 AD. Northern Mathura might have been a Banappandiyan kingdom.
Prince Jinadattaraya was peeved at the way he was treated by his father and decided to leave Mathura, carrying only the idol of Goddess Padmavati with him.
At 800 AD, Santara Pandiyans of Kadamba dynasty were split into two groups. One group of Santaras had preferred to remain at their Royal house at Banavasi. Another group of Santara Pandiyans moved to Hombuja, modern Humcha which became their new capital.
SANTARA PANDIAN DYNASTY
ReplyDeleteHOMBUJA
Hombucha was known as Golden Bit and it was also called in various inscriptions asPomburchchha, Patti Pomburchchha and Pombuchcha.
Humcha which was also called Pattipomburchhapura wbich had been thestronghold of the Kadamba of Banavasi between 3rd to 6th centuries AD and Chalukyas of Badami between 5th to 8th centuries AD.
Humcha became the capital of the Santara dynasty and the principality came to known as Santalige -1000 under the Chalukyas later.
Jinadattaraya migrated to the town of Humcha with an idol of the Jain deity Padmavati, laying the foundation of the Santara kingdom in Humcha. He also built many Jain temples at Humcha.
Prince Jinadattaraya reached a place where he rested under the lakki (Indrani) tree. As he slept, Goddess Padmavati appeared in his dream and instructed him to establish his Kingdom at this place. In the dream, the Goddess asked him to touch her image with his horse's 'bit' part of the bridle in the horse mouth. Jinadatta touched the Idol with the bridle horse bit, which was instantly changed into gold and brought him good fortune. The site of this miracle was henceforth referred to as Hombucha or Golden Bit.
Santaras were Jains and had matrimonial relations with the Saivite Alupa royal family. Both Santara dynasty and Alupa dynasty were Banappandiyan dynasties. Santara dynasty promoted Digambara Jain sect.
VIKRAMA SANTHA
In 897 AD King Vikrama Santha built a Jain temple called Gudda Basadi and installed the idol of Lord Bahubali.
Vikrama Santha had built a separate residence to his Guru Mouni Siddantha Bhattaraka who belonged to kunda Kundanvaya tradition in 897 AD.
On top of the nearby hill, high above the mutt, there is another ancient basadi dedicated to Bahubali, which was constructed in 898 AD by Vikramaditya Santara. Muttinakere, where River Kumudavathi originates from, is nearby.
BHUJABALI SANTHA
Bhujabali Santha had built a Jain temple at Hombuja and had named it after himself. Further, he had donated the village Harivara for the well being of his guru Kanakanandi deva.
SANTARA KING OF KADAMBA COUNTRY
In 934 Santara became the king of Kadamba kingdom. Thus Banavasi Rule of Kadamba king Kalivittarasa Interrupted for one year when Santara was ruling over Banavasi.
MACHIYARASA
In 954 Machiyarasa was ruling in Narakki area Banavasi 12000. Meenavar were called as Machiarasa in the Banappandiyan kingdoms.
SANTARAS, VASSALS OF CHALUKYAS
Around 990 AD Santara Pandiyans of Hombuja and Nurumbada Pandiyans who remained at Kadamba kingdom became vassals of Chalukyas of Kalyani.
SANTALIGE 1000 DIVISION
In 990 Shantara country of Hombuja-Humcha was made a separate province called Santalige 1000 division. It happened towards the end of the 10th century or early 11th century when Hombuja was under the Chalukyas of Kalyani.
After this period Santara country, became Vassal country of many powerful kingdoms such as, The Chalukyas of Kalyani, Rashtakutas,Hoysalas, Vijayanagara dynasty and the Keladi Nayakas etc
SANTALIGE COUNTRY UNDER KADAMBA DYNASTY
In 1012 Hombuja kingdom ie Santalige1000 was brought under the control of Kadamba Kingdom. Santara Prince of Hombuja became a vassal of Kadamba king Chatta Kadamba.
In 1016 AD Santara clans of Hombuja overthrew Kadamba Suzernity. After that Kadamba dynasty of Banavasi ruled only Banavasi 12000 under the suzernity of Jayasimha Vallabha Chalukya.
SANTALIGE UNDER KADAMBA DYNASTY AGAIN
In 1031 Kadamba King Chatta Deva was ruling over Banavasi 12000 and Santalige 1000 ie Hombuja. Son of Kadamba Chatta Deva, SATYASRAYA DEVA, was the GOVERNOR of Santalige province.
HOMBUJA SANTARAS UNDER HOYSALA DYNASTY
Hoysala king Vinayaditya (1047 to 1098) brought Hombuja Santara kingdom under his control.
SANTARA PANDIAN DYNASTY
ReplyDeleteJAGA DEVA SANTARA
In 1099 A.D Jaga Deva Santara was ruling from Patti Pomburchcha Pura ie Humcha.
SANTARA DYNASTY OF KALASA
In 1100 Jakaladevi and Balaraja belonging to Santara dynasty ruled from their capital Kalasa in the Westernghats.
SANTARA DYNASTY OF HOMBUJA
In 1103 AD Santara king Malla Santha in memory of his wife Veera Abbarasi and in honour to his Guru Vadigaratta Ajithasena Pandita Deva had laid the foundation stone of a temple at Hombuja.
BHUJABALI SANTHA
In 1115 A.D Bhujabali Santha of Santara dynasty had built a Jain temple at Hombuja. Nanni Santha, brother of Bhujabali Santha was a staunch follower of Jainism.
SANTALIGE BROUGHT UNDER CHALUKYA DYNASTY
In 1116 AD all Kadamba territories ieBanavasi, Hangal and Santalige 1000 territory ruled by Hombuja Santara dynasty, were united again under the overlordship of Western Chalukya king Taila II.
WAR BETWEEN CHALUKYA AND SANTARA DYNASTY
In 1127 AD there was war between Western Chalukya King Tailapa and Santara king Permadi.
Banavasi Dandanayaka Masanayya sent his brother in law Kaliga Nayaka who defeated Santara king and Santara king was dispossessed of his kingdom.
Santalige continued to be under Kadamba Dynasty until 1130 AD.
CHALUKYA PRINCE CROWNED AS KADAMBA KING
In 1131 AD Mayuravarma III son of Chalukya king Tailapa was made king of Kadamba kingdom All the former Kadamba territories, Hangal,Banavasi 12000 and Santalige 1000 came under his suzernity.
MASANAYYA
Viragal at Hangal says that Dandanayaka, Masanayya alias Masana protected the boy who had been made king as Mayuravarma III.
SANTALIGE UNDER SANTARA KING
In 1172 Veerasantha who succeeded Nanniyaganga as the ruler of Hombuja was called as "Jinadevana Charana Kamalgala Bhrama"
SANTARA KINGS OF HOSAGUNDA
After 1180 Beeradevarasa, Bommarasa and Kammarasa became the kings of the Hosagunda branch of Santara dynasty.
At 1200 AD Teerthahalli region near Humcha was then known as Santalige Savira indicating that Teerthahalli region was under Santalige 1000. Savira meant 1000 in Kannada.
SPLITTING OF SANTARA DYNASTY
Santara dynasty split into two branches by the 12 century AD. One branch was stationed in Hosagunda of Shimoga district and another branch to Kalasa in the Western ghats, chikkamagalur district.
MIGRATION FROM HOMBUJA
Gradually these Santara dynasty branches ie Hosagunda and Kalasa branches or only the Kalasa branch shifted their capitals to Keravashe which was 14 km north-east of Karkala and then to Karkala, both were in the old South Canara district. Hence the territory they ruled was also known as the Kalasa-Karkala kingdom.
HOSAGUNDA SANTARA DYNASTY'S CONVERSION TO HINDUISM
In 1200 Santara branch that was stationed in Hosagunda who were originally Digambara Jains embraced Shavite Hinduism.
KALASA-KARKALA KINGDOM
In 1200 AD a branch of Santara Pandiyan dynasty moved to south from Hombuja-Humcha and founded two capitals.
One capital was Karkala in the coastal plains and another capital Kalasa was in the Western ghats. Hence the territory ruled by Santara Pandiyan dynasty was also known as the Kalasa-Karkala kingdom.
After 1200 AD Santara Kings were also called as Bhairarasa, who ruled over Malenadu region in the Westernghats, as well as the Coastal Districts of Karnataka.
Kalasa-Karakala kingdom extended over a wider area comprising Sringeri, Koppa, Balehonnur, Mudigere in Chikamagalur and most of the Karkala taluk. Kalasa-Karkala kingdom was situated east of Mangalore. Karkala was also known as Pandiya Nagari.
SANTALIGE UNDER VIJAYANAGARA
After 1336 AD Santara dynasty of Hombuja-Hosagunda became the subordinate Vassal country under the suzernity of the Vijayanagara Empire. But the Kalasa-Karkala Santara Pandiyan kingdom remained independent.
SANTARA PANDIAN DYNASTY
ReplyDeleteKARKALA SANTARA PANDYAS
Santara King Veera Bhairarasa ruled from Karkala from 1390 AD to 1420 AD.
INSTALLATION OF BAHUBALI STATUE BY SANTARA VEERA PANDYA DEVA
At 1432 AD Santara Veera Pandya Deva, who was a scholar known for his generous disposition was ruling from Karkala otherwise known as Pandiya Nagari. Karkala had been the capital of Santara dynasty. Santara Veera Pandya maintained good relations with the Sringeri Math. The biggest achievement of Santara Veera Pandya Deva's reign was the installation of the 42 feet high monolithic statue of Lord Bahubali at Karkala at 1432 AD. Santara ruler Veera Pandya had the title Bhairarasa also.
VEERA PANDYA IV
In 1455 AD Santara Veera Pandya was succeeded to throne by his brother's son, Veera Pandya IV and he ruled from 1455 to 1475 AD. King Santara Veera Pandiya IV constructed the 57-foot beautifully carved Manastambha in front of the Neminatha Basadi at Hiriyangady in 1457 AD. On the completion of the Manastambha, he got the title "Abhinava Pandya.''
IMMADI BHAIRARASA VODEYA SANTARA
Chaturmukha Jain Basadi in Karkala was constructed under the patronage of Immadi Vodeya (Bhairava II) of the Santara Dynasty at 1586 AD. Chaturmukha Jain Basadi which had been built in the late 16th-century contains images of Jain saints Aranath, Mallinath and Munisuvratnath. Chaturmukha Basadi was built on top of a small rocky hill in 1586 A.D. The Basadi had four identical entrances from the four quarters leading to the Garbagriha and hence is popularly known as Chaturmukha Basadi.
Immadi Bhairava Vodeya, who was also instrumental in building a "Sadhana Chaityalaya'' at a place called Koppa.
Vodeya title is similar to Udaiyar title of Vanavar subgroup of Villavars.
END OF SANTARA PANDIAN DYNASTY
The Santara Pandiyan dynasty disappeared after the invasions by the Nayakas of Keladi and by Hyder Ali in 1763 AD.
KELADI NAYAKA DYNASTY
The Keladi Nayakas established their kingdom around 1499 AD with capital at Keladi near Hosagunda, in the area formerly ruled by Santara dynasty of Hombuja. Keladi Nayakas also belonged to Bana Dynasty similar to Santara Pandiyan dynasty and to the Banajiga subgroup of Balija Naickers. Keladii Nayakas occupied Karnataka south of Keladi and northern Kerala upto Kannur.
Most of the areas of a Kalasa-Karkala Santara Pandiyan kingdom had been occupied by the Kelady Nayakas by the AD 1700s.
INVASION OF HYDER ALI
In 1763 AD Hyder Ali defeated Keladi Nayakas and annexed Keladi Nayaka kingdom to Mysore kingdom. Hyder Ali invaded Santara Pandiyan kingdom of Karkala in 1763 AD and annexed it to Mysore Kingdom. Santara Pandiyan dynasty completely disappeared after the invasion of Hyder Ali.
CONCLUSION:
The Chera, Chola and Pandiyan kingdoms ruled by Santars who were also known as Nadalvar, Nadar or Chanar. Santar rulers descended from the ancient Villavar-Meenavar dynasty.
Following the invasions of Turkish sultanate in 1311 AD and the invasion of Balija Naickers of Kishkinda-Anegundi in 1377 AD, Chera, Chola and Pandian kingdoms came to an end.
Similarly Santara Pandiyan kingdom of Karnataka came to an end after the invasion of Keladi Nayakas who were Balija Naickers in the 1700s and the invasion of Hyder Ali in 1763 AD.
மாறன், சாந்தகன், பனந்தாரகன், பனையமாறன், வில்லவன், செம்பியன், நாடாழ்வான், மகதை நாடாள்வார், திருப்பாப்பு ஆகியவை நாடார்களுக்குச் மாத்திரம் சொந்தமான சில வில்லவர் பட்டங்கள்.
ReplyDeleteவில்லவ மன்னர்களின் சாந்தகன் பட்டம்
சாந்தகன் பட்டம் என்பது வில்லவ நாடார்களின் சான்றார் பட்டத்தின் மாறுபாடாகும். சேர சோழ பாண்டிய மன்னர்கள் சாந்தகன் பட்டத்தை பயன்படுத்தினர்.
நாடார்களின் வடக்கு உறவினர்களான மீனா வம்ச மன்னர்கள் சாந்தா மீனா பட்டத்தை
பயன்படுத்தினர்.
பரஞ்சோதி முனிவர் இயற்றிய திருவிளையாடற் புராணம் (2613)
ஆற்றல் மிகு பிரதப சூரியன் வங்கிசத்துவன் அளவு இல்
சீர்த்தி
சாற்ற அரிய இரிபும மருத்தனன் சோழ வங்கி சாந்தகன்
தான் வென்றி
மாற்ற அரிய புகழ்ச் சேர வங்கி சாந்தகன் பாண்டி வங்கி
கேசன்
தோற்றம் உறு பரித்தேர் வங்கிச் சிரோமணி பாண்டீச் சுரன்
தான் மன்னோ.
___________________________________________